Skip to main content
Download PDF

miR-19a/b-3p promotes inflammation during cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via SIRT1/FoxO3/SPHK1 pathway

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 18, Article number: 122 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Stroke affects 3–4% of adults and kills numerous people each year. Recovering blood flow with minimal reperfusion-induced injury is crucial. However, the mechanisms underlying reperfusion-induced injury, particularly inflammation, are not well understood. Here, we investigated the function of miR-19a/b-3p/SIRT1/FoxO3/SPHK1 axis in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R).

Methods

MCAO (middle cerebral artery occlusion) reperfusion rat model was used as the in vivo model of I/R. Cultured neuronal cells subjected to OGD/R (oxygen glucose deprivation/reperfusion) were used as the in vitro model of I/R. MTT assay was used to assess cell viability and TUNEL staining was used to measure cell apoptosis. H&E staining was employed to examine cell morphology. qRT-PCR and western blot were performed to determine levels of miR-19a/b-3p, SIRT1, FoxO3, SPHK1, NF-κB p65, and cytokines like TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. EMSA and ChIP were performed to validate the interaction of FoxO3 with SPHK1 promoter. Dual luciferase assay and RIP were used to verify the binding of miR-19a/b-3p with SIRT1 mRNA.

Results

miR-19a/b-3p, FoxO3, SPHK1, NF-κB p65, and cytokines were elevated while SIRT1 was reduced in brain tissues following MCAO/reperfusion or in cells upon OGD/R. Knockdown of SPHK1 or FoxO3 suppressed I/R-induced inflammation and cell death. Furthermore, knockdown of FoxO3 reversed the effects of SIRT1 knockdown. Inhibition of the miR-19a/b-3p suppressed inflammation and this suppression was blocked by SIRT1 knockdown. FoxO3 bound SPHK1 promoter and activated its transcription. miR-19a/b-3p directly targeted SIRT1 mRNA.

Conclusion

miR-19a/b-3p promotes inflammatory responses during I/R via targeting SIRT1/FoxO3/SPHK1 axis.

Background

Stroke is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and occurs when blood vessels in the brain get clogged, leading to insufficient oxygen and nutrient supply to brain tissues and subsequent cell death and brain injury [1]. Recovering the blood flow through drugs or mechanical interventions is key to recovery [2]. However, many studies have shown that the reperfusion will induce severe secondary injuries in that a large amount of cellular free oxygen radicals and inflammatory cytokines will be produced [3, 4]. Emerging evidence suggests that suppression of the inflammatory responses is beneficial for ischemic stroke [5]. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms of the reperfusion-induced inflammation are not well understood.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a widely studied class of endogenous RNAs that are not translated into proteins but have crucial roles in many cellular processes including normal physiological and abnormal pathological processes [6, 7]. Many miRNAs have been implicated in the inflammatory responses during ischemic stroke [8, 9]. For instance, miR-22 has been shown to suppress the inflammation via targeting MAPK signaling [10]. miR-19a-3p/miR-19b-3p (miR-19a/b-3p) are important miRNAs that function as oncogenes to promote tumorigenesis and metastasis [11, 12]. Recent studies have reported that miR-19a/b-3p levels were elevated following ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) [13], suggesting that they might be involved in I/R. Nevertheless, the exact functions of miR-19a/b-3p in ischemic stroke are not clear. Sirtuin1 (SIRT1) is an NDA-dependent protein/histone deacetylase that play key roles in oxidative stress and inflammation via regulating various substrates [14]. Previous studies have indicated that SIRT1 alleviated the brain injury induced by I/R [15]. Further, SIRT1 could directly deacetylate FoxO3, a transcription factor, and negatively regulate FoxO3-induced transcription [16]. Through our preliminary bioinformatic analysis, we identified potential binding sites between miR-19a/b-3p and SIRT1 mRNA. We thus hypothesized that miR-19a/b-3p function through targeting SIRT1/FoxO3 axis in ischemic stroke.

The sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) is an enzyme that functions to phosphorylate sphingosine into sphingosine1 phosphate [17]. It is greatly involved in regulating cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis [17]. Emerging evidence suggests that the SPHK1 has critical roles in mediating inflammatory responses under various conditions including I/R [18]. For example, the SPHK1 has been shown to activate NF-κB signaling to induce secretion of cytokines during I/R [19]. Our preliminary analysis through JASPAR revealed that FoxO3 might directly bind SPHK1 promoter to regulate its transcription. Based on aforementioned literature and our initial analysis, we made a hypothesis that miR-19a/b-3p might be involved in I/R via SIRT1/FoxO3 which could regulate SPHK1-mediated neuroinflammation.

In the current study, we sought to test our above hypothesis and investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the inflammatory responses during I/R, with a focus on miR-19a/b-3p/SIRT1/FoxO3/SPHK1 axis.

Methods

Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rat model

All animal experiments and protocol have been reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Southern Medical University. MCAO surgery was carried out as previously described [20]. Briefly, adult male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (2–3 months old, 250 ~ 300 g b.w., n = 16) were anesthetized by intraperitoneally injecting ketamine and xylazine (250 and 10 mg/kg, respectively). The right common carotid artery (CCA) and external carotid artery (ECA) were dissected free and exposed. A surgical silica gel monofilament was introduced into the ECA until it passed the carotid bifurcation when a resistance was felt. The wound was closed after the monofilament was inserted. After 2 h of occlusion, the monofilament was withdrawn for reperfusion. In sham-surgery group, mice underwent similar procedures and the arteries were exposed for same duration without insertion of monofilament.

Oxygen and glucose deprivation/reperfusion (OGD/R) cell model

To mimic neuronal injury during cerebral ischemia, human neuroblastoma cells (SK-N-SH, SH-SY5Y), purchased from Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection, Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China), were subjected to oxygen and glucose deprivation followed by reperfusion (OGD/R). The cells were cultured in culture medium composed of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, CA, USA), 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, CA, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were grown at 37 °C in the cell incubator with a humidified atmosphere (95%) containing 5% CO2. For OGD/R model, briefly, full culture medium was replaced with glucose-free DMEM, and the cells were placed in an anaerobic chamber (95% N2 and 5% CO2) at 37 °C for various periods (2, 4, 8, 12 h). Subsequently, full culture medium was added back and the cells were maintained in the normal culture condition.

TTC staining

The infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Briefly, rats were anesthetized and the brains were immediately removed followed by coronally sectioning at 2 mm. Two percent 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) was added to incubate with the sections for 10 min at 37 °C to stain the infarct areas. Images were analyzed with ImageJ (National Institute of Health, USA, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) to quantify the infarct size by calculating the integration of infarct areas from all slices of the brain.

H&E staining and TUNEL staining

Brain tissues were fixed in 10% formalin overnight at 4 °C, washed by PBS, and then embedded in paraffin. The tissues were cut into 5-μm-thick slices and then incubated with hematoxulin and eosin (H&E) or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining reagents (Roche Applied Science, USA) for H&E staining or TUNEL staining, respectively, based on the manufacturer’s guidance. The stained brain sections were washed with PBS and then mounted with the mounting medium containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The percentage of apoptotic cells were calculated by dividing TUNEL-positive cells by DAPI-positive cells.

Cell transfection

Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA) was used as the reagent for cell transfection as the manufacturer’s instruction describes. Briefly, cultured cells were cultured to ~ 80% confluence. The short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting SPHK1, SIRT1 and FoxO3, miR-19a/b-3p mimics, miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor, and corresponding negative controls were obtained from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Corresponding constructs above together with Lipofectamine 3000 (m/v 1:1) were directly added into the culture media for 48 h followed by harvest.

MTT cell proliferation assay

In total, 5000 transfected SK-N-SH or SH-SY5Y cells (as indicated in figure legends Figs. 2, 3, and 5) were plated into the single well of 96-well plates 24 h prior to 8 h of OGD/R and were followed by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyltjiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenltetrazolium bromide) incubation (Abcam, USA). Fifty micrograms MTT was put into each well to incubate with cells for 3 h at 37 °C. Afterwards, 100 μl detergent reagent was used to stop the reaction. The absorbance in each condition was analyzed by a 490-nm wavelength.

RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay

MS2-binding sequences (MS2bs) were infused with binding sequences of FoxO3 in WT-SIRT1 promoter or the mutant sequences. Cells were transfected with MS2bs-SIRT1-WT, MS2bs-SIRT1-MUT, or control vector MS2bs-Rluc together with MS2bp-GFP using lipofectamine 3000. After 2 days, transfected cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 180 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1.5% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate) containing RNase inhibitors and protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Extracted proteins were incubated with relevant antibodies (anti-GFP1 or IgG as control) (Millipore, USA) overnight at 4 °C and then pulled down with protein G Sepharose beads (Millipore, USA). The beads were washed with lysis buffer first and then eluted with proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). The elution was proceeded for RNA purification with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, MO, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to examine the RNA yield of target mRNAs. The primers are listed in the qRT-PCR section.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP was carried out with the commercial ChIP kit (Abcam, USA) as the manufacturer’s protocol described. Briefly, formaldehyde was used to cross-link proteins/DNA and cells were washed with PBS followed by harvest via micrococcal nuclease. Cell debris was removed through centrifugation, and the supernatant was collected. To pull down chromatin fragments, 10 μg of anti-FoxO3 or rabbit IgG antibody was added to incubate with the lysate for 1 h at 4 °C. Protein G beads were added to all samples for overnight incubation at 4 °C. The next day, the beads were washed by wash buffer and eluted by elution buffer. The elution was proceeded for DNA purification, and PCR was performed to detect SPHK1 promoter region. The primers used for analysis were as follows: forward: 5′- CCT GGC GGC TTC TTT TTG TCC-3′; reverse: 5′- GGG GCT CTC ATC GGG ATT GG-3′.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)

FITC-labeled oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the FoxO3-binding site sequence in Sphk1 promoter and the mutant probe were synthesized and purchased from Genema (Shanghai, China). EMSA was performed by using the commercial EMSA kit (Thermo Fisher, USA). Native nuclear extracts were isolated from cells, and 5 μg protein extracts were incubated with relevant probes together with or without FoxO3 antibody in the binding buffer for 30 min at room temperature. EMSA loading dye was added to the reaction followed by electrophoresis in Tris-Glycine buffer. The signals of the FITC-labeled probes were detected using the ChemiDoc XRS+ system (Bio-Rad, USA).

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

The Phusion Mutagenesis kit (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) was used to mutate the binding sites as the manufacturer’s protocol described. cDNAs that included the wild-type sequences (WT-SIRT1) or mutated binding sequences (MUT-SIRT1) with miR-19a/b-3p in SIRT1 3′ UTR were cloned into the pGL4 luciferase reporter vector (Promega, WI, USA). Neuroblastoma cells were co-transfected with the recombinant plasmid together with miR-19a/b-3p mimics or mimics negative control (NC) (synthesized from Genepharma, Shanghai, China). Then, 24 h after, the co-transfected cells were harvested in the Reporter Lysis Buffer. The luciferase activity of each sample was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, WI, USA).

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Missouri, USA) was used to isolate total RNAs from cortex infarct tissues or cultured cells as the manufacturer’s instructions described. DNaseI was included into the lysis buffer to avoid the contamination of DNA. Then, 1–2 μg total RNA of each sample was used for reverse transcription and then amplified by PCR with standard kits (TaqPath RT-PCR Master mixes, Invitrogen, Missouri, USA). Relative expression levels of miRNA, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 mRNAs were normalized U6 or GAPDH mRNA as internal controls, respectively. The primers used for the study were as follows:

miR-19a-3p forward primer: 5′-CGCTGTGCAAATCTATGCAAA-3′;

miR-19a-3p reverse primer: 5′-CAGTGTGCAAATCTATGCAA-3′;

miR-19b-3p forward primer: 5′-TGTGCAAATCCATGCAAAACTGA-3′;

miR-19b-3p reverse primer: 5′-CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGT-3′;

TNF-α forward primer: 5′-AGGCGCTCCCCAAGAAGACA-3′;

TNF-α reverse primer: 5′-TCCTTGGCAAAACTGCACCT-3′;

IL-1β forward primer: 5′-GCAGTCTACACAGCTTCGGG-3′;

IL-1β reverse primer: 5′-CCGCCTCAGCCTCCCAAAG-3′;

IL-6 forward primer: 5′-GCCTTCGGTCCAGTTGCCTT-3′;

IL-6 reverse primer: 5′-GCAGAATGAGATGAGTTGTC-3′;

U6 forward primer: 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′;

U6 reverse primer: 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′;

GAPDH forward primer: 5′-GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGTT-3′;

GAPDH reverse primer: 5′-TTGATTTTGGAGGGATCTCG-3′.

Western blot analysis

RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher, MI, USA) was utilized to extract proteins from rat brain cortex or cultured cells as previously described [20]. Protein concentration of each sample was measured by using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher, MI, USA). Equal amounts of protein were loaded into SDS-polyacrylamide gels and separated via electrophoresis. Subsequently, the proteins in the gels were transferred to PVDF membranes (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The membranes were first blocked with 3% BSA for half an hour at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. On the next day, the membranes were washed with TBST 3 times before incubation with specific secondary antibodies (Anti-Rabbit) for 1 h at room temperature. Signals were detected by using the standard ECL kit (Pierce ECL Kit, Thermo Fisher, USA). Primary antibodies used in the study were as follows: Rabbit polyclonal anti-SPHK1 antibody (1:1000, Abcam, USA); Rabbit polyclonal anti-NF-κB p65 antibody (1:1000, Abcam, USA); Rabbit monoclonal anti-FoxO3 antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling, USA); Rabbit polyclonal anti-SIRT1 (1:1000, Abcam, USA); Rabbit polyclonal anti-β-actin (1:5000, Abcam, USA).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were carried out with at least three biological replicates. All statistical analyses were analyzed in GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad, CA, USA). Unpaired Student’s t test (two groups) and one-way ANOVA (more than two groups) were used to determine the statistical significance (P < 0.05). The data were presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation).

Results

MCAO upregulated miR-19a/b-3p, FoxO3, and SPHK1, while it downregulated SIRT1

To study the functions of miR-19a/b-3p, SPHK1, FoxO3, and SIRT1 in cerebral ischemia, we firstly measured their expression levels during ischemia/ reperfusion (I/R). MCAO surgery was performed in adult rats followed by reperfusion. As shown in Fig. 1a,b, I/R caused remarkable brain injury with obvious infarct area in the right hemisphere. H&E staining indicated robust neuronal degeneration following I/R compared to sham group (Fig. 1c). These results demonstrate the success of MCAO model. In infarct tissues, we observed an elevation of miR-19a/b-3p level compared to sham group (Fig. 1d). FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 protein levels were greatly upregulated, while SIRT1 downregulated (Fig. 1e). Besides, we found that MCAO also increased the levels of inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β (Fig. 1f). Taken together, these data show that I/R induced inflammation and neuronal injury, accompanied by an increase in expressions of miR-19a/b-3p, FoxO3, and SPHK1 and a decrease in SIRT1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

MCAO upregulated miR-19a/b-3p, FoxO3, and SPHK1, while downregulated SIRT1. a Representative images of TCC staining of brain sections from sham group or I/R group. b Quantifications of infarct volume in sham group and I/R group. c Representative images of H&E staining of brain sections from sham group or I/R group. d Relative miR-19a/b-3p levels in infarct tissues from sham group and I/R group. e Relative protein levels of SIRT1, FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 in infarct tissues from the sham group and I/R group. f Relative levels of inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β from sham group and I/R group. All the results were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), which were three different experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01

Full size image

Knockdown of SPHK1 suppressed OGD/R-induced cell death

To further investigate the function of SPHK1, we used the cell model of ischemia by subjecting cultured neuronal cells to oxygen and glucose deprivation/reperfusion (OGD/R). With MTT assay, as expected, OGD/R treatment greatly decreased the viability of cells in a time-dependent manner with bigger effect following longer period of treatment (Fig. 2a). We chose 8 h of OGD as the condition for subsequent studies. Transfection of cells with sh-SPHK1 robustly diminished the protein level (Fig. 2b). Notably, knockdown of SPHK1 in cells recovered the viability of cells upon OGD/R (Fig. 2c). Consistently, with TUNEL staining, we found OGD/R treatment drastically increased the number of apoptotic cells while knockdown of SPHK1 suppressed that increase (Fig. 2d). At the molecular level, we showed that OGD/R upregulated SPHK1 and NF-κB p65 protein levels, as well as inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β (Fig. 2e,f). However, transfection of cells with sh-SPHK1 partially restrained those increases (Fig. 2e,f). Altogether, these results suggest that knockdown of SPHK1 decreases OGD/R-induced cell injury and death.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Knockdown of SPHK1 suppressed OGD/R-induced cell death. a MTT assay to analyze cell viability following various periods of OGD/R. b Relative SPHK1 protein level in cells transfected with sh-NC or sh-SPHK1. c MTT assay to analyze cell viability following OGD 8h/R in transfected cells. d TUNEL staining to measure the number of apoptotic cells in transfected cells upon OGD 8h/R. e Relative protein levels of SPHK1 and NF-κB p65 in transfected cells following OGD 8h/R. f Relative levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in transfected cells following OGD 8h/R. All the results were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), which were three different experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01

Full size image

Knockdown of FoxO3 ameliorated OGD/R-induced cell death

We next examined the role of FoxO3 in ischemia and reperfusion. Knockdown of FoxO3 greatly decreased the level of FoxO3 in cells (Fig. 3a). With MTT assay, we found that knockdown of FoxO3 recovered the reduced viability of neuronal cells caused by OGD/R (Fig. 3b). Similarly, sh-FoxO3 suppressed the increased number of apoptotic cells upon OGD/R (Fig. 3c). Western blot results showed that OGD/R increased FoxO3 protein level while knockdown of FoxO3 repressed the elevated levels of FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 induced by OGD/R (Fig. 3d). In addition, the upregulation of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and during OGD/R were suppressed by sh-FoxO3 (Fig. 3e). We, therefore, conclude that knockdown of FoxO3 reduces OGD/R-induced cell death.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Knockdown of FoxO3 ameliorated OGD/R-induced cell death. a Relative FoxO3 protein level in cells transfected with sh-NC or sh-FoxO3. b MTT assay to analyze cell viability in transfected cells following OGD/R. c TUNEL staining to measure the number of apoptotic cells in transfected cells upon OGD/R. d Relative protein levels of SPHK1 and NF-κB p65 in transfected cells following OGD/R. e Relative levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in transfected cells following OGD/R. All the results were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), which were three different experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01

Full size image

FoxO3 transcriptionally activated SPHK1 expression

FoxO3 is a transcription factor that regulates expression of multiple genes. We wondered whether FoxO3 modulated expression of SPHK1 since knockdown of both had similar effects on OGD/R-induced cell death. First, we found knockdown of FoxO3 in cells significantly decreased SPHK1 protein level (Fig. 4a). Through JASPAR analysis, we found a potential binding site of FoxO3 in the promoter region of SPHK1 (Fig. 4b). To test whether FoxO3 directly bound SPHK1 promoter, we employed the EMSA assay. As shown in Fig. 4c, we observed a DNA/protein complex when FoxO3 protein was incubated with the probe corresponding to the predicted FoxO3 binding region of SPHK1 promoter, but not with the mutant probe wherein the binding sites were mutated. Furthermore, FoxO3 antibody further up-shifted the DNA/protein complex (Fig. 4c). Moreover, with ChIP, we found that immunoprecipitation with specific FoxO3 antibody significantly pulled down more SPHK1 promoter compared to control IgG antibody (Fig. 4d). Knockdown of FoxO3 disrupted that interaction (Fig. 4d). These results provide evidence that FoxO3 directly binds the promoter of SPHK1.

Fig. 4
figure 4

FoxO3 transcriptionally activated SPHK1 expression. a Relative SPHK1 protein levels in cells transfected with sh-NC or sh-FoxO3. b Predicted binding sites of FoxO3 in SPHK1 promoter. c EMSA to determine the interaction between FoxO3 and SPHK1 promoter. d ChIP to analyze FoxO3/SPHK1 promoter interaction. e  Quantification of relative abundance of FoxO3 bound to SPHK1 promoter. All the results were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), which were three different experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01

Full size image

Knockdown of SIRT1 enhanced OGD/R-induced cell death via FoxO3

To study the role of SIRT1 in ischemia, we manipulated its level via shRNA and tested ensuing effects on cell death following OGD/R. Transfection of cells with sh-SIRT1 remarkably diminished the protein level of SIRT1 (Fig. 5a). With MTT assay, we showed that OGD/R deceased cell viability while knockdown of SIRT1 further reduced the viability (Fig. 5b). However, co-transfection of cells with sh-FoxO3 blocked the effects of sh-SIRT1 (Fig. 5b). We saw similar results in TUNEL staining. OGD/R greatly increased the number of apoptotic cells while knockdown of SIRT1 significantly further upregulated the number (Fig. 5c). Knockdown of FoxO3 suppressed the increase induced by SIRT1 knockdown (Fig. 5c). At the molecular level, we found that OGD/R decreased SIRT1 protein level (Fig. 5d). Knockdown of SIRT1 further decreased SIRT1 expression but increased the levels of FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 (Fig. 5d). Co-expression of sh-FoxO3 with sh-SIRT1 partially reversed those changes caused by sh-SIRT1 alone (Fig. 5d). Consistently, RT-qPCR results showed that knockdown of SIRT1 further upregulated levels of cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β while sh-FoxO3 suppressed those increases caused by sh-SIRT1 (Fig. 5e). These data demonstrate that knockdown of SIRT1 promotes OGD/R-induced cell death via increasing FoxO3.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Knockdown of SIRT1 enhanced OGD/R-induced cell death via FoxO3. a Relative SIRT1 protein level in cells transfected with sh-NC or sh-SIRT1. b MTT assay to analyze cell viability in transfected cells following OGD/R. c TUNEL staining to measure the number of apoptotic cells in transfected cells upon OGD/R. d Relative protein levels of SIRT1, FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 in transfected cells following OGD/R. e Relative levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in transfected cells following OGD/R. All the results were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), which were three different experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01

Full size image

The miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor suppressed OGD/R-induced cell injury via SIRT1

We then investigated the functional role of miR-19a/b-3p in ischemia. As expected, transfection of cells with miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor robustly decreased miR-19a/b-3p level (Fig. 6a). Western blot results indicated that miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor reversed OGD/R-induced changes of protein expression by increasing SIRT1 level and decreasing the levels of FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 (Fig. 6b). Nevertheless, knockdown of SIRT1 with sh-SIRT1 reversed the effects of miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor, resulting in elevations of FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 (Fig. 6b). Similarly, the miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor suppressed the increases of cytokine levels such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β following OGD/R (Fig. 6c). Again, knockdown of SIRT1 blocked the effects of miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor (Fig. 6c). Together, these data indicate that miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor ameliorates OGD/R-induced cell injury via SIRT1.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor suppressed OGD/R-induced cell injury via SIRT1. a Relative miR-19a/b-3p levels in cells transfected with inhibitor NC or miR-19a/b-3p inhibitor. b Relative protein levels of SIRT1, FoxO3, SPHK1, and NF-κB p65 in transfected cells following OGD/R. c Relative levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in transfected cells following OGD/R. All the results were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), which were three different experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01

Full size image

miR-19a/b-3p directly targeted SIRT1

Our aforementioned results show that miR-19a/b-3p negatively regulates SIRT1 expression, implying that SIRT1 might be a downstream target of miR-19a/b-3p. To test that, we first performed bioinformatic analysis by TargetScan and found some complementary binding sites between miR-19a/b-3p and SIRT1 mRNA (Fig. 7a). To directly validate this interaction, we then used the dual luciferase assay and found miR-19a/b-3p mimics greatly decreased the luciferase activities of WT-SIRT1 3′UTR but not MUT-SIRT1 3′UTR wherein the predicted binding sites were mutated (Fig. 7b). Further, we used RIP assay to confirm the interaction in neuronal cells. Consistently, the result showed that immunoprecipitation of WT-SIRT1 3′UTR significantly enriched more miR-19a/b-3p compared to control of MUT-SIRT1 3′UTR (Fig. 7c). Altogether, these results demonstrate that miR-19a/b-3p directly binds SIRT1 mRNA to negatively regulate its expression.

Fig. 7
figure 7

miR-19a/b-3p directly targeted SIRT1. a Predicted binding sites between miR-19a/b-3p and SIRT1 mRNA and the sequences of SIRT1 3′UTR MUT. b Relative luciferase activities of WT-SIRT1 3′UTR and MUT-SIRT1 3′UTR in cells transfected with mimics NC or miR-19a/b-3p mimics. c RIP to analyze the binding between WT-SIRT1 3′UTR and miR-19a/b-3p. All the results were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), which were three different experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01

Full size image

Discussion

Stroke affects millions of people around the world and is the leading cause of disability and death [1, 21]. Despite numerous advances made, the mechanisms underlying reperfusion injury remain largely unknown and thus effective treatments are limited [2, 22]. In this study, we revealed that miR-19a/b-3p/SIRT1/FoxO3/SPHK1 axis play a crucial role in the inflammatory responses during I/R. miR-19a/b-3p, FoxO3, and SPHK1 were upregulated while SIRT1 was downregulated in I/R. Inhibition of miR-19a/b-3p or knockdown of FoxO3 and SPHK1 greatly suppressed the I/R-induced inflammation and cell death while knockdown of SIRT1 promoted them. Mechanistically, we showed that miR-19a/b-3p targeted SIRT1 while FoxO3 transcriptionally activated SPHK1.

SPHK1 is an important enzyme mediating the synthesis of sphingosine-1 phosphate [23]. SPHK1 has been shown to play critical roles in lipid metabolism, endoplasm reticulum stress, and mitochondrial function [24,25,26]. Further, SPHK1 is implicated in regulating inflammatory responses by activating NF-κB signaling or affecting releases of inflammation factors [19, 27]. Here, following I/R injury wherein inflammatory responses were initiated and cytokines were released, we observed an elevation of SPHK1 and induction of the NF-κB pathway. Moreover, knockdown of SPHK1 suppressed the levels of NF-κB p65 and cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, resulting in less cell death upon I/R. Our results demonstrate an essential role of SPHK1 in inducing inflammatory responses in I/R. Interestingly, we showed that I/R-induced elevation of SPHK1 was mediated by FoxO3-dependent activation of transcription. FoxO3 directly bound SPHK1 promoter and activated its transcription. Knockdown of FoxO3 had similar effects to SPHK1 knockdown. These results suggest that FoxO3/SPHK1 could serve as a promising target for suppression for ischemia treatment. FoxO3 is a very important transcription factor that regulates expression of many genes [28, 29]. Future studies are necessary to examine whether other targets of FoxO3 are involved in I/R. In addition, it remains to be explored whether the activation of FoxO3/SPHK1 signaling occurs during the ischemia phase or following reperfusion. Previous studies have reported an elevation of FoxO3 level during hypoxia [30, 31]. Therefore, it is possible that this pathway cascade is activated during ischemia and gets exaggerated following reperfusion.

As an NAD-dependent deacetylase, SIRT1 has various substrates and thus plays roles in many processes, such as cell proliferation/apoptosis, stress resistance, inflammation, and even autoimmunity [32,33,34]. Previous studies have shown that SIRT1 negatively regulates FoxO3 expression to modulate aging, skeletal muscle function, and cardiovascular homeostasis [35,36,37,38]. Consistently, SIRT1 level was inversely correlated with FoxO3 level in cells upon I/R. The upregulation of FoxO3 following I/R might be caused by reduced expression of SIRT1. Notably, we identified that SIRT1 was a downstream target of miR-19a/b-3p. The decreased expression of SIRT1 following I/R was due to increased levels of miR-19a/b-3p. miR-19a/b-3p inhibitors suppressed the inflammation while knockdown of SIRT1 blocked that suppression. These data provide evidence that the interaction of miR-19a/b-3p and SIRT1 greatly contributes to I/R injury.

Both FoxO3 and SPHK1 have been implicated in myocardial I/R [38]. For instance, FoxO3 and SPHK1 were observed elevated during myocardial I/R [38, 39]. Furthermore, blockade of the activation ameliorated the cardiac inflammation and injury [18, 38]. In addition to that, reduced SIRT1 has been reported in cardiomyocytes during I/R injury and increasing SIRT1 level could confer protection against I/R injury in cardiomyocytes [40, 41]. Our study, together with previous studies, indicate that activation of FoxO3/SPHK1 is a conserved signaling pathway during I/R injury. Therefore, therapeutic strategies targeting FoxO3/SPHK1 could be widely used to combat I/R injury.

Conclusions

In summary, in combination of both in vivo and in vitro models of ischemia/reperfusion, we demonstrate that miR-19a/b-3p/SIRT1 promotes neuroinflammation via regulating FoxO3/SPHK1 signaling, thus leading to cell death upon I/R. Suppression of the inflammation by targeting miR-19a/b-3p/SIRT1/FoxO3/SPHK1 could be a promising avenue to improve the outcome of ischemic stroke.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

I/R:

Ischemia/reperfusion

miRNAs:

MicroRNAs

SIRT1:

Sirtuin1

SPHK1:

Sphingosine kinase 1

CCA:

Carotid artery

ECA:

External carotid artery

OGD/R:

Oxygen and glucose deprivation followed by reperfusion

TTC:

Triphenyltetrazolium chloride

H&E:

Hematoxulin and eosin

TUNEL:

Transferase dUTP nick end labeling

RIP:

RNA immunoprecipitation

MS2bs:

MS2-binding sequences

ChIP:

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

EMSA:

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

WT-SIRT1:

Wild-type sequences

MUT-SIRT1:

Mutated binding sequences

SD:

Standard deviation

NC:

Negative control

References

  1. Guzik A, Bushnell C. Stroke epidemiology and risk factor management. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2017;23(1, Cerebrovascular Disease):15-39.

  2. Goldstein LB. Modern medical management of acute ischemic stroke. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2014;10(2):99–104. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.14797/mdcj-10-2-99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jayaraj RL, Azimullah S, Beiram R, Jalal FY, Rosenberg GA. Neuroinflammation: friend and foe for ischemic stroke. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16(1):142. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12974-019-1516-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Radak D, Resanovic I, Isenovic ER. Link between oxidative stress and acute brain ischemia. Angiology. 2014;65(8):667–76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0003319713506516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anrather J, Iadecola C. Inflammation and stroke: an overview. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13(4):661–70. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s13311-016-0483-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gebert LFR, MacRae IJ. Regulation of microRNA function in animals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(1):21–37. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41580-018-0045-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ardekani AM, Naeini MM. The role of MicroRNAs in human diseases. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2010;2(4):161–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal A, Prathap R, Gupta S, Chaurasia A, Chaudhary P. Role of microRNAs in stroke recovery. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(6):1850–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_296_19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tahamtan A, Teymoori-Rad M, Nakstad B, Salimi V. Anti-inflammatory MicroRNAs and their potential for inflammatory diseases treatment. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1377. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong H, Cui B, Hao X. MicroRNA22 alleviates inflammation in ischemic stroke via p38 MAPK pathways. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20(1):735–44. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3892/mmr.2019.10269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang XM, Yu XN, Liu TT, Zhu HR, Shi X, Bilegsaikhan E, et al. microRNA-19a-3p promotes tumor metastasis and chemoresistance through the PTEN/Akt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;105:1147–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang T, Ye L, Han Z, Liu Y, Yang Y, Peng Z, et al. miR-19b-3p promotes colon cancer proliferation and oxaliplatin-based chemoresistance by targeting SMAD4: validation by bioinformatics and experimental analyses. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36(1):131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ge XL, Wang JL, Liu X, Zhang J, Liu C, Guo L. Inhibition of miR-19a protects neurons against ischemic stroke through modulating glucose metabolism and neuronal apoptosis. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2019;24(1):37. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s11658-019-0160-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahman S, Islam R. Mammalian Sirt1: insights on its biological functions. Cell Commun Signal. 2011;9(1):11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1478-811X-9-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernandez-Jimenez M, Hurtado O, Cuartero MI, Ballesteros I, Moraga A, Pradillo JM, et al. Silent information regulator 1 protects the brain against cerebral ischemic damage. Stroke. 2013;44(8):2333–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brunet A, Sweeney LB, Sturgill JF, Chua KF, Greer PL, Lin Y, et al. Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science. 2004;303(5666):2011–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1126/science.1094637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alemany R, van Koppen CJ, Danneberg K, Ter Braak M, Meyer Zu Heringdorf D. Regulation and functional roles of sphingosine kinases. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2007;374(5-6):413–28. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00210-007-0132-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang F, Xia Y, Yan W, Zhang H, Zhou F, Zhao S, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling contributes to cardiac inflammation, dysfunction, and remodeling following myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;310(2):H250–61. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1152/ajpheart.00372.2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Su D, Cheng Y, Li S, Dai D, Zhang W, Lv M. Sphk1 mediates neuroinflammation and neuronal injury via TRAF2/NF-kappaB pathways in activated microglia in cerebral ischemia reperfusion. J Neuroimmunol. 2017;305:35–41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.01.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang M, Cheng G, Tan H, Qin R, Zou Y, Wang Y, et al. Capsaicin protects cortical neurons against ischemia/reperfusion injury via down-regulating NMDA receptors. Exp Neurol. 2017;295:66–76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee RHC, Lee MHH, Wu CYC, Couto ESA, Possoit HE, Hsieh TH, et al. Cerebral ischemia and neuroregeneration. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13(3):373–85. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4103/1673-5374.228711.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawabori M, Yenari MA. Inflammatory responses in brain ischemia. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(10):1258–77. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2174/0929867322666150209154036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao Y, Gao F, Chen K, Tian ML, Zhao DL. Sphingosine kinase 1 as an anticancer therapeutic target. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:3239–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li L, Wang H, Zhang J, Sha Y, Wu F, Wen S, et al. SPHK1 deficiency protects mice from acetaminophen-induced ER stress and mitochondrial permeability transition. Cell Death Differ. 2019.

  25. Kim S, Sieburth D. Sphingosine kinase activates the mitochondrial unfolded protein response and is targeted to mitochondria by stress. Cell Rep. 2018;24(11):2932–45 e4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kwong EK, Li X, Hylemon PB, Zhou H. Sphingosine kinases/sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling in hepatic lipid metabolism. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2017;3(4):176–83. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s40495-017-0093-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun W, Ding Z, Xu S, Su Z, Li H. Crosstalk between TLR2 and Sphk1 in microglia in the cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced inflammatory response. Int J Mol Med. 2017;40(6):1750–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3892/ijmm.2017.3165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Webb AE, Brunet A. FOXO transcription factors: key regulators of cellular quality control. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39(4):159–69. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Willcox BJ, Tranah GJ, Chen R, Morris BJ, Masaki KH, He Q, et al. The FoxO3 gene and cause-specific mortality. Aging Cell. 2016;15(4):617–24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/acel.12452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Qi XF, Li YJ, Chen ZY, Kim SK, Lee KJ, Cai DQ. Involvement of the FoxO3a pathway in the ischemia/reperfusion injury of cardiac microvascular endothelial cells. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013;95(2):242–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.08.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bakker WJ, Harris IS, Mak TW. FOXO3a is activated in response to hypoxic stress and inhibits HIF1-induced apoptosis via regulation of CITED2. Mol Cell. 2007;28(6):941–53. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang HC, Guarente L. SIRT1 and other sirtuins in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2014;25(3):138–45. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.tem.2013.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang JF, Zhang YL, Wu YC. The role of Sirt1 in ischemic stroke: pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:833. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fnins.2018.00833.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang T, Kraus WL. SIRT1-dependent regulation of chromatin and transcription: linking NAD(+) metabolism and signaling to the control of cellular functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1804(8):1666–75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.10.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee D, Goldberg AL. SIRT1 protein, by blocking the activities of transcription factors FoxO1 and FoxO3, inhibits muscle atrophy and promotes muscle growth. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(42):30515–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1074/jbc.M113.489716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yao H, Chung S, Hwang JW, Rajendrasozhan S, Sundar IK, Dean DA, et al. SIRT1 protects against emphysema via FOXO3-mediated reduction of premature senescence in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(6):2032–45. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1172/JCI60132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Murtaza G, Khan AK, Rashid R, Muneer S, Hasan SMF, Chen J. FOXO Transcriptional Factors and Long-Term Living. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:3494289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xin Z, Ma Z, Jiang S, Wang D, Fan C, Di S, et al. FOXOs in the impaired heart: New therapeutic targets for cardiac diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863(2):486–98. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Boal F, Roumegoux J, Alfarano C, Timotin A, Calise D, Anesia R, et al. Apelin regulates FoxO3 translocation to mediate cardioprotective responses to myocardial injury and obesity. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):16104. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/srep16104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Deng M, Wang D, He S, Xu R, Xie Y. SIRT1 confers protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury in cardiomyocytes via regulation of uncoupling protein 2 expression. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(5):7098–104. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3892/mmr.2017.7452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ding M, Lei J, Han H, Li W, Qu Y, Fu E, et al. SIRT1 protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via activating eNOS in diabetic rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14(1):143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12933-015-0299-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to give our sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their constructive comments.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 81771340), the Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province (B2019062), and the Special Fund of Foshan Summit Plan (2020A022, 2019D044).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center of Clinical Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

    Feng Zhou & Bing-Yi Wu

  2. Department of Neurology, First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

    Feng Zhou, Yu-Kai Wang & Cheng-Guo Zhang

Authors
  1. Feng Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Kai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheng-Guo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bing-Yi Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and study design: CGZ, BYW; data acquisition and analysis: FZ, YKW; manuscript drafting: FZ; manuscript revising: CGZ, BYW. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript to be published.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cheng-Guo Zhang or Bing-Yi Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments and protocol have been reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Southern Medical University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, F., Wang, YK., Zhang, CG. et al. miR-19a/b-3p promotes inflammation during cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via SIRT1/FoxO3/SPHK1 pathway. J Neuroinflammation 18, 122 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12974-021-02172-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12974-021-02172-5

Keywords

Journal of Neuroinflammation

ISSN: 1742-2094